FCA review reveals GI shortcomings

The review included 13 insurers and 30 insurance intermediaries (including four price comparison websites).

Linda Woodall, acting director of supervision at the FCA said:

"Consumers should expect clear information about the payment options available to them. Regardless of whether people choose to pay upfront or in instalments, it’s important that they can see exactly what they are signing up for and how much it costs so they can decide whether they are getting a fair deal."

The FCA’s findings reveal that insurers and intermediaries do not always provide clear and easily understandable information about the overall cost of paying for insurance, meaning that consumers could struggle to compare the difference between paying upfront or in instalments. In some cases, people may not realise there is a price difference between the two.

If a firm is providing regulated credit or is acting as a credit broker, they are required to provide a representative example setting out the interest rate, any fees or charges, a representative annual percentage rate and the total amount payable. However, FCA researchers found a number of cases where this was either not provided or the example did not include all of the required information, potentially limiting a customer’s ability to make an informed choice about how to pay.

The FCA review also identified a wide range of APRs, highlighting the importance to customers of having appropriate information to be able to compare pricing and understand the impact that the cost of finance has on the overall cost of an insurance product.

The FCA also found that an adequate explanation of a proposed credit agreement was not always provided sufficiently early in the customer journey to enable customers to make informed decisions.

Additionally, firms acting as a credit broker did not always disclose the name of the credit provider or details of their relationship with the firm, and in some cases it was not made clear that a fee would be charged.